Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2011 15:27:24 -0800 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: Maciej Milewski <milu@dat.pl> Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Re: update - new hal flag to force a full chip reset Message-ID: <CAJ-Vmonu%2Bu61TxXUPdVBq8B4-9qec06LeVpAKi5PS_9kEMHE3w@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2230529.Gp80hNdgYq@snifi> References: <CAJ-VmomPuBs_51-X8Pin4MPtek507EUe5yjJbKhv906FtHAMZg@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-VmonNPmLcCQGHHQkix0-a2X70LSUng9gXMqWikM1A8yQ_sg@mail.gmail.com> <939228459.20111106231805@serebryakov.spb.ru> <2230529.Gp80hNdgYq@snifi>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Just stick with the AR9220/AR9280 NICs. I have to fix this stuff, right? So unless you absolutely, positively require stuff right now (and if you do, grab an AR9160), stick with the AR9220/AR9280. The AR9220/AR9280 in 5ghz mode works just fine in my testing. I haven't (re) tested the AR9285/AR9287 in congested 2.4ghz mode. I'll try to do that this week. Adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-Vmonu%2Bu61TxXUPdVBq8B4-9qec06LeVpAKi5PS_9kEMHE3w>