Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 12:29:12 +0200 From: Jaakko Heinonen <jh@FreeBSD.org> To: Alexander Best <alexbestms@wwu.de> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au> Subject: Re: namei() returns EISDIR for "/" (Re: svn commit: r203990 - head/lib/libc/sys) Message-ID: <20100311102911.GA2574@a91-153-117-195.elisa-laajakaista.fi> In-Reply-To: <permail-2010031021503880e26a0b00006ec1-a_best01@message-id.uni-muenster.de> References: <20100305055758.GA1062@a91-153-117-195.elisa-laajakaista.fi> <permail-2010031021503880e26a0b00006ec1-a_best01@message-id.uni-muenster.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2010-03-10, Alexander Best wrote: > could this panic have been triggered by the patch? It doesn't look like it's caused by the patch. > panic() at panic+0x15f > _mtx_lock_flags() at _mtx_lock_flags+0xc5 > fdesc_allocvp() at fdesc_allocvp+0xbf > fdesc_lookup() at fdesc_lookup+0x15c > > this was 100% reducible when doing `portsnap fetch` though i changed a lot of > stuff in my kernel config and reverted a lot of src patches to resolve the > issue so i'm not sure what exactly was causing it. The panic happened in fdescfs code. Did you have local patches related to fdescfs? -- Jaakko
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100311102911.GA2574>