Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 10:23:18 +0200 From: Neil Blakey-Milner <nbm@mithrandr.moria.org> To: "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/mutt-devel Makefile pkg-plist Message-ID: <20010903102317.C20551@mithrandr.moria.org> In-Reply-To: <20010903110628.G72833@ringworld.oblivion.bg>; from roam@ringlet.net on Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 11:06:28AM %2B0300 References: <200109030549.f835nDa75558@freefall.freebsd.org> <20010903110628.G72833@ringworld.oblivion.bg>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon 2001-09-03 (11:06), Peter Pentchev wrote: > On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 10:49:13PM -0700, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote: > > dwcjr 2001/09/02 22:49:13 PDT > > > > Modified files: > > mail/mutt-devel Makefile pkg-plist > > Log: > > Update PORTDOC compliance > > > > Submitted by: maintainer > > Aside from the use of %%PORTDOCS%% mentioned by others, I think that > both this and rev. 1.126 should have bumped PORTREVISION. > > IIRC, the rule for bumping PORTREVISION is that any change which > modifies the package should be indicated as such. The previous > commit would have modified a package built with a different LOCALBASE, > and this commit would have modified a package built with NOPORTDOCS > (e.g. a custom release build). Theoretically the minimum is that it changes the packages we (as FreeBSD) generate. But I'm reasonably sure Debian (and maybe RedHat) do bumps whenever the package source changes. Neil -- Neil Blakey-Milner nbm@mithrandr.moria.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010903102317.C20551>