Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 02:51:28 -0700 From: Kent Stewart <kstewart@urx.com> To: bio@gmx.net Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IBM DTLA307030 (which is an UDMA100 device) only seen as UDMA33 ? Message-ID: <3B331520.578090FB@urx.com> References: <200106220335.15791@obscuro.org> <3B32B0E1.807435C4@urx.com> <200106220906.49555@obscuro.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Darian Lanx wrote: > > > Have you set the BIOS to permit dma on the new drive? > Hello kent, thanks for the answer > Yes, the BIOS allows UDMA mode 5 (which is ata 100) > Even though I do not like to compare OS, the Linux driver seems to have no > problems, seeing the drive as UDMA100 > So I am very stunned as what to is wrong. > Since I am a BSD bewbie, I am sure it is my fault Well, I have three systems running ATA-100 drives. I don't have any IBM's but the ata-disk from FreeBSD 4.2 and on, I think, supported UDMA100. There were things such as cable length that made a difference. Since mine all work, I don't have any ideas about what you could be doing wrong. Kent > > Thanks again > -d -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA ICQ# 121258098 mailto:kbstew99@hotmail.com http://kstewart.urx.com/kstewart/index.html http://daily.daemonnews.org/ SETI (Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence) @ Home http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3B331520.578090FB>