Date: Sat, 27 May 2000 17:12:36 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> To: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> Cc: Chuck Paterson <cp@bsdi.com>, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>, Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Preemptive kernel on older X86 hardware Message-ID: <392F8374.C99B68AB@newsguy.com> References: <200005251700.LAA25373@berserker.bsdi.com> <392E97B7.1A575FAC@newsguy.com> <200005261738.KAA90605@apollo.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Matthew Dillon wrote: > > :Won't declaring the function as inline work? > : > :-- > :Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) > > Not if you want to use __FILE__, __LINE__, etc... for tracing purposes. > > Besides, using an inline there creates a lot of bloat. For debugging purposes only, but I didn't think of __FILE__ & cia, indeed. -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org capo@another.bsdconspiracy.org "Sentience hurts." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?392F8374.C99B68AB>