Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 09:37:15 +0100 From: Markus Hoenicka <markus.hoenicka@mhoenicka.de> To: "Paul A. Hoadley" <paulh@logicsquad.net> Cc: seanc@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, delphij@FreeBSD.org, Volker Stolz <vs@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: ports/89703: [maintainer-update] textproc/refdb to 0.9.6 Message-ID: <1133426235.438eb63b56434@www.domainfactory-webmail.de> In-Reply-To: <20051130223321.GB58035@bigbird.logicsquad.net> References: <200511291335.jATDZkD8037402@freefall.freebsd.org> <20051130005103.GB93035@bigbird.logicsquad.net> <20051130151338.GF26259@i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de> <20051130223321.GB58035@bigbird.logicsquad.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Paul A. Hoadley" <paulh@logicsquad.net> was heard to say: > Excellent. I'll tack on Markus Hoenicka too, the author of RefDB. > BTW, none of this is going into GNATS---should it be? Not only of RefDB, but I'm also the root evil of all libdbi and libdbi-drivers problems :-) I'm not really familiar with the FreeBSD ports Makefile logic, so I may be off track here. But I've already discussed with Paul that one of the problems here is that the libdbi library is unversioned (i.e. libdbi.so.0 for all versions). Would it be easier to define the dependencies if I'd finally manage to understand libtool's support for library versioning? If I understand this correctly, we could test for the existence of libdbi.so.1 (or whatever the version number would jump to) if we need that particular version. regards, Markus -- Markus Hoenicka markus.hoenicka@cats.de (Spam-protected email: replace the quadrupeds with "mhoenicka") http://www.mhoenicka.de
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1133426235.438eb63b56434>