Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 13:12:08 +0100 From: joerg@britannica.bec.de To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [patch] Re: dlopen() and dlclose() are not MT-safe? YES, esp. for libthr Message-ID: <20060324121208.GB9523@britannica.bec.de> In-Reply-To: <4423DDFA.3090504@highway.ne.jp> References: <44215FE9.2070602@highway.ne.jp> <20060322174312.GB27116@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20060322190725.GC27116@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <4421BA34.8040908@highway.ne.jp> <20060323105440.GD27116@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20060324084834.GE27116@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <4423DDFA.3090504@highway.ne.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 08:54:34PM +0900, Kazuaki Oda wrote: > * The current implementation of rtld has a problem both with > libpthread and libthr. It works only with libc_r. It doesn't work correctly with libc_r. Concurrent dlopen and dlclose of the same shared object doesn't work fully corretly ATM, but the patch isn't the best approach either. Joerg
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060324121208.GB9523>