Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 04:50:57 +1100 From: andrew clarke <mail@ozzmosis.com> To: David Newman <dnewman@networktest.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: upgrading 9.3 / ZFS v28 Message-ID: <20141118175057.GA6144@ozzmosis.com> In-Reply-To: <546B8040.1090508@networktest.com> References: <54697AA5.6040804@networktest.com> <20141117123929.GB60429@ozzmosis.com> <546A1538.4040801@networktest.com> <20141117181527.GA62908@ozzmosis.com> <546A91D4.3070009@networktest.com> <20141118064714.GA75897@ozzmosis.com> <546B8040.1090508@networktest.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue 2014-11-18 09:22:08 UTC-0800, David Newman (dnewman@networktest.com) wrote: > You're correct about incorrect usage of index numbers. I should just be > using '-i 1' for all disks. > > Previously I used bogus values '-i 2' and '-i 3'. Is it sufficient to > rerun the gpart bootcode with '-i 1' to correct this, or are other > remedial steps needed? I think -i 1 on all disks should be enough. The bogus values were most likely harmless but if you're at all concerned by potential data loss then it might be worthwhile running "zpool scrub". > Thanks again for your help. You're welcome. Regards Andrew
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20141118175057.GA6144>