Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 00:36:15 +0100 From: Gerald Heinig <Gerald.Heinig@post.rwth-aachen.de> To: Ignatios Souvatzis <is@beverly.kleinbus.org> Cc: freebsd-isdn@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Question about FRMR transmit, although docs say not to Message-ID: <3A735B6F.D0644868@post.rwth-aachen.de> References: <3A7338BE.FA7EC4B9@post.rwth-aachen.de> <20010127221737.C1588@beverly.kleinbus.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ignatios Souvatzis wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 10:08:14PM +0100, Gerald Heinig wrote: > > Hi there, > > This has me puzzled, since if you don't transmit a certain frame at any time (according to the state machine > > definition), you can't expect to receive it! > > Uhm, wait. > > - You can expect to have equipment working according to older (or newer) > protocol versions That's the only reason I could think of that makes sense. > > - hm, is the protocol symmetric at that level at all? If not, the other side > might well be allowed to send that. Quite right. The protocol isn't symmetric, but I was under the impression that Q921 describes TE _and_ NT behaviour. If it only describes TE behaviour, then that would answer the question. However, why does i4b then _transmit_ a FRMR frame? > > Regards, > -is To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isdn" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3A735B6F.D0644868>