Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 11:30:09 -0700 From: "David Schwartz" <davids@webmaster.com> To: <jmutter@netwalk.com>, "John Reynolds~" <jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com> Cc: <freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: RE: Mindcruft ... Message-ID: <000301be9725$4e6c7f30$021d85d1@whenever.youwant.to> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9905051214150.298-100000@insomnia.local.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Well, someone asked this a few days ago and the general response was > that Mindcraft's reputation was rather tainted at the moment. It > would be nice though to see a test, formal or informal, of FreeBSD > 3.X, Linux (Whatever is the latest stable kernel), and NT 4.0 all > tuned by a professional on the same hardware, same situation, etc... > Generally, a fair test on a level playing field. Same hardware is not a level playing field. Sensible people optimize the hardware for the operating system they plan to use. I could show you Linux and NT beating the stuffing out of FreeBSD by using my MX98713 network card in 100Mbps half duplex mode. For some reason FreeBSD chokes on it. DS To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?000301be9725$4e6c7f30$021d85d1>