Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 09:03:49 -0700 From: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> To: mohamed aslan <maslanbsd@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: organization Message-ID: <42497C65.7010807@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <319cceca05032907411014a218@mail.gmail.com> References: <319cceca0503281001792baf39@mail.gmail.com> <42485A54.9000101@freebsdbrasil.com.br> <319cceca05032811484cb1a95b@mail.gmail.com> <42487982.30909@freebsdbrasil.com.br> <319cceca05032907411014a218@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
mohamed aslan wrote: > guys this is not a flame war > but the linux way in arranging the source file is really better than > freebsd way, it's a fact. > however it's easy to rearrange it in 1 min as someone said before. > but i mean this step should be done from the core team. > for example all fs has to go in a subdir called fs > arch specific file should go in subdir called arch/(arch name) > and so on . > if ls the files in freebsd sys subdir , u will got about 54 subdirs > and a makefile while linux contains about 15 subdirs only. > > guys, don't take my words against bsd , i admit that the performace of > bsd is much better than linux and i'm planning to change to it as my > primary os. but we can get the good things from linux and through out > the bad ones. > Have you ever thought that time is better spent on engineering rather than silly dicussions of 'facts' like yours? I really don't give a hoot what Linux's layout is, nor whether you think that changing FreeBSD to be more like it is a trivial task. Scott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42497C65.7010807>