Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 10:18:43 -0700 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: Paul Albrecht <palbrecht@glccom.com> Cc: "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: freebsd 10 kqueue timer regression Message-ID: <CAJ-VmonJQKWeW7K6%2BjY6=FpmZrm%2B6HQOuBmhhjJEapyVpwNFdQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8ABC0977-FB8F-45E7-ACCC-BFA92EE22E1C@glccom.com> References: <8ABC0977-FB8F-45E7-ACCC-BFA92EE22E1C@glccom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2 October 2014 08:07, Paul Albrecht <palbrecht@glccom.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > What=E2=80=99s up with freebsd 10? I=E2=80=99m testing some code that use= s the kqueue timer for timing and it doesn=E2=80=99t work because the preci= sion of the timer is off. Can you provide a test case for it? I just chased down one of those recently; maybe it's the same thing (callout() API changes.) -a
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-VmonJQKWeW7K6%2BjY6=FpmZrm%2B6HQOuBmhhjJEapyVpwNFdQ>