Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 10 Oct 2002 23:36:02 -0500 (CDT)
From:      Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com>
To:        twig les <twigles@yahoo.com>
Cc:        Duncan Patton a Campbell is Dhu <freebsd@babayaga.neotext.ca>, Matt Piechota <piechota@argolis.org>, <freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: Sniffer nic
Message-ID:  <20021010233434.Q815-100000@patrocles.silby.com>
In-Reply-To: <20021008212150.26159.qmail@web10102.mail.yahoo.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, twig les wrote:

> Nope, nothing like that.  Just some good old L3-7
> NIDS.  A couple things I was wondering though....  Is
> anyone running the "ANA-62011 64-bit single port
> 10/100baseTX adapter" from Adaptec?  It's supported by
> 4.6 release, but I won't be on site for the
> installation so I'm looking for easy installation
> here.  This leads to the second question which is:
> What kind of performance increase will I see with a
> 64-bit 100BT nic vs the same card running in a 32-bit
> slot?  I'm tryig to figure out if it's worth the extra
> $30 before I tell my boss to get it (well...ask him).
>
> Thnx for the answers so far though.

You're best off going with a more commonly used card.  That adaptec cards
sound rather rare, so it's more likely that the driver is stale.  If you
want a NIC which will last into the future, get one of the Intel Gigabit
cards - the driver is officially maintained by an employee of Intel, so
you have someone to yell at if it breaks. :)

(And Luigi claims that it performs well too...)

Mike "Silby" Silbersack


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021010233434.Q815-100000>