Date: 04 Jul 2002 22:39:18 -0400 From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@FreeBSD.org> To: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> Cc: Sean Chittenden <sean@chittenden.org>, Barney Wolff <barney@tp.databus.com>, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Skinny (SCCP) protocol gateway for libalias Message-ID: <1025836759.1380.109.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> In-Reply-To: <20020704153646.A2034@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> References: <1025480857.48597.33.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20020630204452.A56736@tp.databus.com> <1025485730.48597.35.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20020630213704.A57193@tp.databus.com> <1025487696.48597.43.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20020630202858.B10041@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> <20020704151541.D77084@ninja1.internal> <20020704153646.A2034@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-rJ/ddkkImRFSrOTnL1EP Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2002-07-04 at 18:36, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 03:15:41PM -0700, Sean Chittenden wrote: > > > IMO you shouldn't consider it. Cisco will probably support this > > > protocol for years. Even if they "abandon" it, it will still be > > > supported because there are already sites with thousands of phone > > > that aren't going to upgrade on a whim. I believe it should go in. > > > If at some point in the future it is actually gone from real use, > > > then it can be removed. > >=20 > > Ehh.. I worked for the dept in Cisco that was deploying the call > > manager servers for Cisco... this puppy's going to be around for a > > while: Cisco dumped a huge chunk of change into implementing and > > deploying this. They're not about to write this off as a sunk cost > > any time soon (unlike Unity, which got the ax). -sc >=20 > Exactly, between the deployed sites and the costs of building this, > Cisco isn't going to abandon this any time soon. I want to see this > funcionality go in since it should improve my chances of getting a real > office phone in my office (which is in a seperate state from the other > corporate offices). I'll need a src committer to review and commit the patches. I am but a lowly ports committer ;-). Maybe I should file a PR.... Joe >=20 > -- Brooks >=20 > --=20 > Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. > PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --=-rJ/ddkkImRFSrOTnL1EP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA9JQbWb2iPiv4Uz4cRAlmtAKCe0iyW7o7rdd0cG2c4VwyQ16jkUACgg3WG 45lN/bnJ8nV3eKrnepCSjDk= =49Qg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-rJ/ddkkImRFSrOTnL1EP-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1025836759.1380.109.camel>