Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 18 Oct 2013 12:21:42 +0200
From:      Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@rocketmail.com>
To:        freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: firefox 24.0,1 (ports rev. r328930)
Message-ID:  <1382091702.3945.15.camel@archlinux>
In-Reply-To: <20131018083340.GA22327@sh4-5.1blu.de>
References:  <20131016101127.GA2140@sh4-5.1blu.de> <20131018083340.GA22327@sh4-5.1blu.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 2013-10-18 at 10:33 +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El d=C3=ADa Wednesday, October 16, 2013 a las 12:11:27PM +0200, Matthias =
Apitz escribi=C3=B3:
>=20
> >=20
> > Hello,
> >=20
> > I've compiled my used ports from revision r328930 on a 10-CURRENT; this
> > brings firefox-24.0,1; I was higly surprised about the fact that FF 24.=
0
> > is able out of the box (i.e. without installing linux-flash) to play
> > content from youtube.com; it says a short moment "a plugin is needed to
> > play this content", but than the movie comes up. How is this working?
> >=20
> > Other sites, like http://www.telesurtv.net , are not working. Why?
>=20
> Hello,
>=20
> Ralf, thanks for your explanation re/ HTML5;
>=20
> I have now installed as well the Linux flash plugin and it's working
> fine; but: now youtube does not play anymore and complains that I should
> install flash or HTML5; it only plays after removing the .mozilla/plugin
> again; any idea to make both happy on the same time; maybe I must use
> two different firefox dirs...

I don't use my FreeBSD install very often and for my Linux that I'm
using each day, I didn't install flashplayer.

IIRC this year there were two threads at freebsd-questions about this
issue, I might be mistaken and confuse it with a similar issue or
another list.





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1382091702.3945.15.camel>