Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 14:32:25 +0200 From: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: Kazuaki Oda <kaakun@highway.ne.jp> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [patch] Re: dlopen() and dlclose() are not MT-safe? YES, esp. for libthr Message-ID: <20060324123225.GG27116@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <4423DDFA.3090504@highway.ne.jp> References: <44215FE9.2070602@highway.ne.jp> <20060322174312.GB27116@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20060322190725.GC27116@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <4421BA34.8040908@highway.ne.jp> <20060323105440.GD27116@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20060324084834.GE27116@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <4423DDFA.3090504@highway.ne.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--BQPnanjtCNWHyqYD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 08:54:34PM +0900, Kazuaki Oda wrote: > Kostik Belousov wrote: > > I did understand the purpose of the thread mask code in > > libexec/rtld/rtld_lock.c, or, more precisely, the condition where this = code > > works (for the context, see the mails with same subject on freebsd-hack= ers). > >=20 > > Look, that code assumes that blocking async signals would stop thread > > scheduler from doing preemption of the current thread. This works > > for libc_r, but fails in libpthread and libthr cases. libpthread provid= es > > implementation of the locks for rtld. But libthr does not ! > >=20 > > As result, rtld exhibit races when used with libthr. In other words, > > libthr needs code to do proper locking. > >=20 > > Do you agree ? Does somebody already planned to do this work ? > >=20 > > Best regards, > > Kostik Belousov >=20 > I'm a bit confused. Do you mean the following? >=20 > * The current implementation of rtld has a problem both with > libpthread and libthr. It works only with libc_r. It does not work correctly with libc_r too. > * In libpthread case, the problem goes away if we modify rtld code. Yes. > * In libthr case, in addition to above, we must modify libthr code to > provide implementation of the locks for rtld. Yes. --BQPnanjtCNWHyqYD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEI+bYC3+MBN1Mb4gRAj07AJ9juDKTVIIEs+Zt4WiNSO/zPajEYACgrOAG s6fhh4iFaka6huvxUVTOvPY= =e15F -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BQPnanjtCNWHyqYD--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060324123225.GG27116>