Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 11:28:40 -0600 From: Ian Lepore <ian@FreeBSD.org> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>, Paul Albrecht <palbrecht@glccom.com> Subject: Re: freebsd 10 kqueue timer regression Message-ID: <1412270920.12052.3.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmonJQKWeW7K6%2BjY6=FpmZrm%2B6HQOuBmhhjJEapyVpwNFdQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <8ABC0977-FB8F-45E7-ACCC-BFA92EE22E1C@glccom.com> <CAJ-VmonJQKWeW7K6%2BjY6=FpmZrm%2B6HQOuBmhhjJEapyVpwNFdQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 2014-10-02 at 10:18 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 2 October 2014 08:07, Paul Albrecht <palbrecht@glccom.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > What=A2s up with freebsd 10? I=A2m testing some code that uses the kq= ueue timer for timing and it doesn=A2t work because the precision of the = timer is off. >=20 > Can you provide a test case for it? >=20 > I just chased down one of those recently; maybe it's the same thing > (callout() API changes.) >=20 The old mail thread he cited contains test code: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2012-July/039907.html -- Ian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1412270920.12052.3.camel>