Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 01:17:52 +0200 From: Clement Laforet <sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org> To: "Sean Hamilton" <sh@planetquake.com> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: apache2's perchild MPM not working under 5.0-RELEASE Message-ID: <20030717011752.4ee35188.sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org> In-Reply-To: <002901c34be6$e8c1eb90$0300000a@antalus> References: <Pine.LNX.4.43.0307161356030.779-100000@pilchuck.reedmedia.net> <20030716214947.GB1644@cus.org.uk> <002901c34be6$e8c1eb90$0300000a@antalus>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 15:09:21 -0700 "Sean Hamilton" <sh@planetquake.com> wrote: > "Jeremy C. Reed" <reed@reedmedia.net> wrote: > | The apache2 port build and installed with WITH_MPM=perchild does > | not work for me [...] > > As far as I can tell, perchild MPM is dead. Which sucks, as it was by far > Apache 2.0's coolest feature. If you view the CVS log, it has not seen any > real work in a year. There is an alternative MPM to perchild : metuxmpm. http://www.sannes.org/metuxmpm/ regards, clem
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030717011752.4ee35188.sheepkiller>