Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2000 17:10:34 +0100 From: Danny Pansters <danny@ricin.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Re[2]: KDE Message-ID: <00120917103402.18875@ricin.localnet> In-Reply-To: <16156361763.20001209162945@x-itec.de> References: <000801c06196$b080e5c0$14131518@elcjn1.sdca.home.com> <00120915441500.18875@ricin.localnet> <16156361763.20001209162945@x-itec.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> coding apps for KDE at the moment or for... Well, I can understand that especially with all the "this time you need QT release x.y.z for a change" that kept popping up when kde2 was still in beta. From what I've gathered though it would be easier coding for qt/kde then it is for gtk/gnome but I have no experience with that myself. Still, as an environment to work with rather than work on (as I do), admittedly with 256megs of ram, I feel its all could ask for at this time. Sure I'm biased like everyone else :-) but I think the konqueror browser is the most important improvement that kde has for the end user (ok if/when working properly). It's so much nicer than netscape. I don't have random crashes or anything like that with kde, but sure it's not perfect (aRTS anyone?) and it probably will never be. But I do think that it's a good thing that the kde folks did a rewrite and really made everything modularized much like windows is (meant to). People will disagree about this. In fact, I believe this is where the whole kde/gnome wars bog down to on any level from user experience up to developers interests/likings. I hope I wont get flamed for having discussions in a Q & A mailinglist... Grtz, Danny To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?00120917103402.18875>