Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 26 Aug 2001 05:28:27 +0900
From:      Fuyuhiko Maruyama <fuyuhik8@is.titech.ac.jp>
To:        Greg Lewis <glewis@eyesbeyond.com>
Cc:        freebsd-java@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: jdk1.3.1 awt exception, plugin, OpenJIT
Message-ID:  <55u1yvrij8.wl@tripper.private>
In-Reply-To: <20010826040557.A87652@misty.eyesbeyond.com>
References:  <20010825120422.A18841@misty.eyesbeyond.com> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0108242313120.8716-100000@daedalus.cs.brandeis.edu> <20010825130721.A20869@misty.eyesbeyond.com> <55wv3sqxtc.wl@tripper.private> <20010826040557.A87652@misty.eyesbeyond.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At Sun, 26 Aug 2001 04:05:57 +0930,
Greg Lewis wrote:
> > 
> > Making symbolic link
> > /usr/local/jdk1.3.1/include/freebsd->/usr/local/jdk1.3.1/include/bsd
> > and
> > /usr/local/jdk1.3.1/include-old/freebsd->/usr/local/jdk1.3.1/include-old/bsd
> > may also fix the problem.
> 
> Will it be easier if the build installs these include files in freebsd
> rather than bsd?  I think maybe that is more correct, what are your
> thoughts?
I think installing those files in freebsd is not so good because our
J2SDK tree isn't only for FreeBSD but also for NetBSD and OpenBSD even
if currently it runs only on FreeBSD.  From OpenJIT's point of view,
porting OpenJIT for NetBSD or OpenBSD may be easy as it already
supports Linux and FreeBSD by almost same codes, so placing those
include files in `bsd' is not so bad -- it simplifies our configure
scripts.  The problem caused by the directory name can be solved by
modifing OpenJIT's configure scripts and it is quite easy and already
finished.

Bad news is OpenJIT doesn't work with our current J2SDK 1.3.1 at this
time.

> > By the way, I'm implementing OpenJIT2, the brandnew OpenJIT designed from
> > scratch and the work is stopping because I'm now working to port J2SDK
> > 1.3.1 for *BSD.  Which is more important do you think?  To complete
> > OpenJIT2? or to port J2SDK 1.3.1 first?
> 
> Only you can answer this :).  From the BSD point of view I appreciate
> the work you do on both, but naturally am biased towards the JDK :).
Just a joke!  I will do both work. ;-)

--
Fuyuhiko MARUYAMA <fuyuhik8@is.titech.ac.jp>
Matsuoka laboratory,
Department of Mathematical and Computing Sciences,
Graduate School of Information Science and Engineering,
Tokyo Institute of Technology.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?55u1yvrij8.wl>