Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 10:04:40 +0200 From: Jean-Baptiste Quenot <jbq@caraldi.com> To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Q) eclipse 3.2 (Callisto) Message-ID: <20060801080439.GB70025@vision.anyware> In-Reply-To: <970c0a6b0607312222j54352929i829de592c6d704fa@mail.gmail.com> References: <970c0a6b0607280839qc05e2b8p51118955745b7cda@mail.gmail.com> <20060728155808.GI55747@vision.anyware> <768690DD58883C4FAA0C089A534F94DF2054A8@intexch02.int.appriss.com> <970c0a6b0607312222j54352929i829de592c6d704fa@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* David Sledge:
> I made the port directory eclipse3.2 so that eclipse 3.1.2 can
> still be installed if people have problems with the new version.
> [...] Also, would it be better to submit it as an update to the
> existing eclipse port or leave it as a new port eclipse3.2?
That is not a good idea to have two versions of Eclipse in our
ports tree because there are 26 ports depending on Eclipse. So
basically if you have two versions of Eclipse you'll have 54 ports
to maintain instead of 27. AFAICT it is too big an effort for the
FreeBSD Eclipse community.
Best regards,
--
Jean-Baptiste Quenot
aka John Banana Qwerty
http://caraldi.com/jbq/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060801080439.GB70025>