Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2002 12:27:47 -0700 From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> To: "Neal E. Westfall" <nwestfal@directvinternet.com> Cc: Lawrence Sica <lomifeh@earthlink.net>, Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr>, chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Why did evolution fail? Message-ID: <3D7CF633.187527E@mindspring.com> References: <20020909115857.F9219-100000@Tolstoy.home.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Neal E. Westfall" wrote: > > > This is just what I am trying to get people to admit, that evolution > > > requires tremendous leaps of faith. Now if you could see that it is also > > > irrational, my job would be done. > > > > The problem with this idea is that we all freely admit that > > evolution is a *theory*. > > That is completely irrational. Yet, to reject it would imply something > that evolutionists just cannot bear to accept. Why is it "completely irrational"? All it amounts to is that we are willing to acknowledge that we don't know everything. -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3D7CF633.187527E>