Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 27 Mar 2001 21:31:42 +0200
From:      "Karsten W. Rohrbach" <karsten@rohrbach.de>
To:        Doug Barton <DougB@DougBarton.net>
Cc:        Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org>, Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>, Andrew Reilly <areilly@bigpond.net.au>, David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: ** HEADS UP ** portmap daemon renamed to rpcbind
Message-ID:  <20010327213141.A38317@rohrbach.de>
In-Reply-To: <3AC0D674.9785E656@DougBarton.net>; from DougB@DougBarton.net on Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 10:05:40AM -0800
References:  <20010326175419.X40349@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20010321104438.A94096@dragon.nuxi.com> <20010326090306.D40349@wantadilla.lemis.com> <3ABEF43A.D4DA1929@DougBarton.net> <20010326172414.V40349@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20010326181905.B75840@gurney.reilly.home> <20010326175419.X40349@wantadilla.lemis.com> <200103270740.f2R7eJ942673@harmony.village.org> <20010327152621.A20645@rohrbach.de> <3AC0D674.9785E656@DougBarton.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Doug Barton(DougB@DougBarton.net)@Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 10:05:40AM -0800:
> "Karsten W. Rohrbach" wrote:
> > 
> > Warner Losh(imp@harmony.village.org)@Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 12:40:18AM -0700:
> > > In message <20010326175419.X40349@wantadilla.lemis.com> Greg Lehey writes:
> > > : > Play the ball, not the man.
> > > :
> > > : I don't have an objection to the change, I was just asking.  And
> > > : "because System V does it this way" has never been a good answer for
> > > : us.  And no, I'm not picking on Doug, just making a point.
> > >
> > > I see no reason why the name can't remain portmap.
> > >
> > does it take parameters?
> > then it would make sense to have it named rpcbind...
> 
> 	Pardon me being dense, but what does that have to do with anything?
> portmap took a -v flag, or are you talking about something different? 

the idea is, that if rpcbind takes parameters different from portmap it
would make sense to call rpcbind rpcbind because people's boxes will
start to barf when rpcbind is called portmap, they make world, and skip
reading the rpcbind paragraph in UPDATING ;-)

does this make sense?

/k

-- 
> Hugh Hefner is a virgin.
KR433/KR11-RIPE -- http://www.webmonster.de -- ftp://ftp.webmonster.de


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010327213141.A38317>