Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 00:08:55 -0500 From: "Nikolas Britton" <nikolas.britton@gmail.com> To: "Atom Powers" <atom.powers@gmail.com> Cc: Darrin Chandler <dwchandler@stilyagin.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, "Marc G. Fournier" <freebsd@hub.org> Subject: Re: BSDstats: Just added - Vendor Stats Message-ID: <ef10de9a0608262208k7d53fb3cs3c8623dab998f782@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <df9ac37c0608262100w59ee80d9maa58902d5dd35c24@mail.gmail.com> References: <20060826223927.I82634@hub.org> <20060827020210.GA9218@zloy.stilyagin.com> <df9ac37c0608262100w59ee80d9maa58902d5dd35c24@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 8/26/06, Atom Powers <atom.powers@gmail.com> wrote: > On 8/26/06, Darrin Chandler <dwchandler@stilyagin.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 10:43:38PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > > > > > Neat to see nVidia *much* more popular then ATI though ... > > > > Really? Why is that neat? nVidia restricts your choices through their > > staunch refusal to provide open specs. They are not nice players in this > > game. At least there's some hope about ATI after the AMD deal. > > > > Probably because the /good/ AMD boards use an nVidia chipsets. ( eg, the K8N) > What I think is interesting is the only ~50% uptake of FreeBSD/amd64 on 64-bit x86 capable systems. FreeBSD/i386 takes ~90% of the pie. Also the less then 1% uptake of sparc64 and alpha ports and 0% for FreeBSD/PPC. Maybe we should can some of these platform ports, how much overhead do they add to the project? -- BSD Podcasts @: http://bsdtalk.blogspot.com/ http://freebsdforall.blogspot.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ef10de9a0608262208k7d53fb3cs3c8623dab998f782>