Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 19:08:07 +0100 From: Wilko Bulte <wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl> To: Cejka Rudolf <cejkar@fit.vutbr.cz> Cc: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Performance of -current vs -stable Message-ID: <20020212021141.2E81D9EE40@okeeffe.bestweb.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 10:15:02AM +0100, Cejka Rudolf wrote: > Garance A Drosihn wrote (2002/02/06): > > Anything else I should check? I realize there's about a million > > differences between the two branches, and there might also be > > something about my machine's setup which is a major culprit here. > > I'm just looking for a basic idea of what other people have been > > seeing for performance when they run current. > > There is another common source of confusion: If anybody has IDE > disks, write-caching is enabled by default in -stable, but disabled > in -current. I don't think that is true anymore. -stable has WC enabled as well. -- | / o / /_ _ wilko@FreeBSD.org |/|/ / / /( (_) Bulte Arnhem, the Netherlands To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020212021141.2E81D9EE40>