Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2000 13:43:44 -0500 From: Richard Wackerbarth <rkw@dataplex.net> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: asm_pci.h,v Holy cow! Message-ID: <00042413373504.09404@nomad.dataplex.net> In-Reply-To: <39046BF1.1CFBAE39@elischer.org> References: <39041698.15FB7483@elischer.org> <200004241536.LAA33905@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <39046BF1.1CFBAE39@elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 24 Apr 2000, Julian Elischer wrote: > This seems well thought out and I certainly agree that we don't need > DIFFs of firmware. > I wonder if we can somehow "cheat time" and get that 13MB file out of > the source tree and retro-actively tag the new scheme so > that we don't have to carry it around forever :-) It looks like a port, Smells like a port, and tastes like a port. It must be a ..... merlot ? Seriously, perhaps we should consider putting optional pieces of the kernel (eventually much of it, I hope) into a ports style structure. This structure can already take care of most of the problems like this one because it has multiple mechanisms whereas the source tree has only one. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?00042413373504.09404>