Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 12:47:11 -0800 From: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> To: Kevin Oberman <oberman@es.net> Cc: Assar Westerlund <assar@FreeBSD.ORG>, mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Lucent Wavelan and 4.2 works like a charm. Message-ID: <20010104124711.B13545@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> In-Reply-To: <200101042033.f04KXVJ17907@ptavv.es.net>; from oberman@es.net on Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 12:33:31PM -0800 References: <5ly9wrgubu.fsf@assaris.sics.se> <200101042033.f04KXVJ17907@ptavv.es.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 12:33:31PM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > I think the default should be changed to BSS. See > > http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-kern/2000/12/31/0007.html for some > > arguments. Comments? > > Another vote for this. Looks like ad-hoc is going away on the Windows > side, as well, in favor of IBSS. Ad hoc mode was never a standard, > just something that worked. I'll vote for that. I'm working up a patch to add support for standard 802.11 options to ifconfig and I'll include this in that patch. There are good uses for ad-hoc (we're going to be using it to research ad-hoc routing protocols at work). -- Brooks -- Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010104124711.B13545>