Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1998 04:34:52 -0800 From: "Joseph T. Lee" <nugundam@la.best.com> To: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Do I really need inetd? Message-ID: <19981224043452.A23609@la.best.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.981224000443.29305A-100000@phoenix.aye.net>; from Barrett Richardson on Thu, Dec 24, 1998 at 12:13:09AM -0500 References: <Pine.BSF.3.96.981224000443.29305A-100000@phoenix.aye.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Dec 24, 1998 at 12:13:09AM -0500, Barrett Richardson wrote: > I have all my necessary network services running as daemons. In the > face of recent discoveries of problems caused for inetd by nmap > and various things I've come to the conclusion that I really don't > need inetd -- another variable I can eliminated from the mix. inetd centralizes the daemon management, besides providing some protection such as sandboxing said daemons instead of letting them all run as root as needed. In relation to the nmap thing, you can limit the number of daemon children/max connections per minute per IP through, to discourage DoS attacks. -- Joseph nugundam =best=com==/==\=IIGS=/==\=Playstation=/==\=Civic HX CVT=/==\ # Anime Expo 1998 >> www.anime-expo.org/ > # Redline Games >> www.redlinegames.com/ > # Cal-Animage Epsilon >> www.best.com/~nugundam/epsilon/ > # EX: The Online World of Anime & Manga >> www.ex.org/ / To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19981224043452.A23609>