Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2000 13:51:30 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com> To: Marius Bendiksen <mbendiks@eunet.no> Cc: Neil Blakey-Milner <nbm@mithrandr.moria.org>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Conditionally removing cosmetic messages for small kernels (PICOBSD). Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.10008021351070.31711-100000@semuta.feral.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.10008022220320.34784-100000@login-1.eunet.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Is there a known define that can be used by kernel module writers so they know when they're on PicoBSD? On Wed, 2 Aug 2000, Marius Bendiksen wrote: > > If I were to do/start the work on the rest of the system, would this be > > acceptable? Initial patch attached. (There seems to be "quirk" fixes > > mixed in with the cosmetic stuff, so the patches aren't as clean as they > > could be.) > > This sounds like a great idea to me. I've been pondering hacking up > patches for BUILD_TINY/BUILD_SMALL options throughout various system > utilities, but I just haven't had the time to look at it yet. > > Being able to tune various parts of the build process better (memory > footprint vs speed etc..) would allow us to tailor PicoBSD to more uses > than we're currently able to. > > Marius > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.10008021351070.31711-100000>