Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 22:02:57 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper <youshi10@u.washington.edu> To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@math.missouri.edu> Subject: Re: Slight problem with make actual-package-depends with ports Message-ID: <469D9F01.6090204@u.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <469D8EB0.7030603@FreeBSD.org> References: <469D62D3.70908@math.missouri.edu> <469D8EB0.7030603@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Doug Barton wrote:
> Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
>
>> I appreciate that most people won't have this problem, but it has bitten
>> me.
>>
>> After you have made and installed a port, but don't clean it, and then
>> made a bunch of other ports, if you go back to the original port and
>> then do "make package", then +CONTENTS can be a bit messed up for the
>> package. This is because the creation of other ports might disturb
>> _LIB_RUN_DEPENDS and might put in some extra entries in +CONTENTS.
>>
>
> "Doctor, it hurts when I do THIS."
> "Well, don't do that." :)
>
> Doug
Heh. That can't be as bad as when I was fubar'ing pkg_install last
week after creating accidental segfault conditions. Not being able to
install ports for 1-2 days sucked :P.
-Garrett
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?469D9F01.6090204>