Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 20:44:57 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger <netchild@FreeBSD.org> To: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/doc/subsys Dependencies Doxyfile-cam Doxyfile-crypto Doxyfile-dev_pci Doxyfile-dev_sound Doxyfile-dev_usb Doxyfile-geom Doxyfile-i4b Doxyfile-kern Doxyfile-libkern Doxyfile-linux Doxyfile-net80211 ... Message-ID: <20060526204457.3e545e4f@Magellan.Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <10526.1148667636@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <200605261806.k4QI67D3007680@repoman.freebsd.org> <10526.1148667636@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> (Fri, 26 May 2006 20:20:36 +0200): > In message <200605261806.k4QI67D3007680@repoman.freebsd.org>, Alexander Leiding > er writes: > > > This is the kernel subsystem API documentation generation framework. > > > > It uses doxygen to generate the API documentation. For each subsystem > > a very small (about 20 lines with comments) subsystem specific Doxyfile > > has to be written (have a look at the README for more). All common doxygen > > options are specified in a separate file. > > Now, this is all well and good, but the most critical question in > my mind is: how do we prevent (or alternatively: mark up) documentation > for functions which are not supposed to be public ? http://www.stack.nl/~dimitri/doxygen/commands.html#cmdinternal Bye, Alexander. -- Selling GoodYear Eagle F1 235/40ZR18, 2x 4mm + 2x 5mm, ~150 EUR you have to pick it up between Germany/Saarland and Luxembourg/Capellen http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060526204457.3e545e4f>