Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 02:38:02 +0100 From: Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@rocketmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sharing a mail folder between Linux and FreeBSD Message-ID: <1359337082.2513.39.camel@q> In-Reply-To: <1359336202.2513.30.camel@q> References: <op.wrguj103uwjkcr@freebsd> <20130125133346.f1484ed8.freebsd@edvax.de> <op.wrgzatq7uwjkcr@freebsd> <20130125150414.f262d162.freebsd@edvax.de> <op.wrg019couwjkcr@freebsd> <20130125161215.f498f4e4.freebsd@edvax.de> <5102FE7B.4070808@gmail.com> <op.wrj87jhnuwjkcr@freebsd> <20130127153838.15b97613@X220.ovitrap.com> <20130127135806.4d19e997.freebsd@edvax.de> <1359336202.2513.30.camel@q>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 13:58 +0100, Polytropon wrote: > > If you only will have to handle a few ports, using the "bare > > ports method" (make) is probably the easiest way (in case > > everything else stays definitely consistent). What could become inconsistent without upgrading or downgrading? I didn't update again, I e.g. kept the Chromium version with the security risk, since, as you explained, there's no way to really control dependency issues, when installing security updates. If there should be a valid method I understand, to find out what ports have wrong permissions, it would be nice, but I don't understand what to do, the output I already have is hardly comprehensible and understandable. :) Regards, Ralf
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1359337082.2513.39.camel>