Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 18:25:22 -0400 (EDT) From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@MIT.EDU> To: kientzle@freebsd.org, Romain Garbage <romain.garbage@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bsdtar --gname switch Message-ID: <alpine.GSO.1.10.1110171805180.882@multics.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <CAL5Kp4eFnbL9cx5tbBYTdeXMJT3QpzP79QM_a0wMVJH5i9j4_g@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAL5Kp4dzTM5JDYR9o2nV=hFpV9hguFNe1n5tdPNnKWxFC-8Oqw@mail.gmail.com> <CAL5Kp4eFnbL9cx5tbBYTdeXMJT3QpzP79QM_a0wMVJH5i9j4_g@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. ---559023410-1228076958-1318890323=:882 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE On Mon, 17 Oct 2011, Romain Garbage wrote: > Hi, > > Following previous advice from questions@, I filed a PR for this > (bin/161749) and I'm forwarding the previous mail to this list: > > According to bsdtar(1) manpage, tar has a --gname switch that permits > to set an arbitrary groupname in the tar archive, but: > $ tar -cf foo.tar --gname root bar > tar: Option --gname is not supported > Usage: > =C2=A0List: =C2=A0 =C2=A0tar -tf <archive-filename> > =C2=A0Extract: tar -xf <archive-filename> > =C2=A0Create: =C2=A0tar -cf <archive-filename> [filenames...] > =C2=A0Help: =C2=A0 =C2=A0tar --help > > I get the same error for --uname and --gid switches. I'm running > 9.0-BETA3 (r226421). Does this have any chances to be corrected in a > not to far away future? This is, at present, a documentation bug. FreeBSD svn revision 207786 was "Various manpage updates, including many=20 long-option synonyms that were previously undocumented", which added the=20 gname long-format option to bsdtar.1. However, this option is not present= =20 in usr.bin/tar/cmdline.c in FreeBSD head, though it was added in r2349 of= =20 upstream libarchive sources on May 1, 2010. So, it looks like it should=20 have been in libarchive since 2.8.4; however, pulling tarballs for 2.8.4=20 and 2.8.5 it does not seem that gname is listed in cmdline.c for either of= =20 them. I'm not familiar with the libarchive release process; Tim, can you shed=20 some insight on what happened here? Thanks, Ben Kaduk ---559023410-1228076958-1318890323=:882--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.GSO.1.10.1110171805180.882>