Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 12 Mar 2014 10:07:02 -0500
From:      Eric van Gyzen <eric@vangyzen.net>
To:        Bob Bishop <rb@gid.co.uk>, Danny Schales <dan@LaTech.edu>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ZFS UNMAP performance
Message-ID:  <53207816.7030104@vangyzen.net>
In-Reply-To: <C7680FD4-885B-4295-9D82-AB1CF869B928@gid.co.uk>
References:  <531F2BA0.6000105@LaTech.edu> <CAFHbX1JghVaQ3xM2OZ6jpWOs6tn=Z8epd8Om3NW_CDnZHPSdng@mail.gmail.com> <531F3503.8090403@LaTech.edu> <531F767C.3040105@LaTech.edu> <531F8EAA.1020107@vangyzen.net> <531FAA20.7080407@latech.edu> <C7680FD4-885B-4295-9D82-AB1CF869B928@gid.co.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 03/12/2014 05:01, Bob Bishop wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 12 Mar 2014, at 00:28, Danny Schales <dan@LaTech.edu> wrote:
>
>> On 3/11/2014 5:31 PM, Eric van Gyzen wrote:
>>>> Replying to myself...I note that the system is reporting that TRIM is
>>>> being used.  Is this normal for non-SSD systems?  There *is* SSD in the
>>>> system, but I'm pretty sure the system can't tell it's SSD (it's hidden
>>>> behind a Dell PERC card).  The number of trim.successes is roughly
>>>> equivalent to the number of deletes reported by gstat for the ISCSI LUN
>>>> devices.  Should the system be using TRIM for ISCSI LUNs?
>>> Sure, if the LUN (i.e. the storage controller) reports that it supports
>>> TRIM/UNMAP.  Note that this is completely unrelated to the type of disks
>>> that provide the LUN's backing store.
>>>
>>>> kstat.zfs.misc.zio_trim.bytes: 232845656064
>>>> kstat.zfs.misc.zio_trim.success: 30810983
>>>> kstat.zfs.misc.zio_trim.unsupported: 809
>>>> kstat.zfs.misc.zio_trim.failed: 0
>>>>
>>>> Danny
>>>>
>> Are there any risks to turning off TRIM to see if the performance
>> improves (other than the loss of space recovery)?
>>
>> Danny
> If the backing store really is SSD then turning off TRIM should hurt write performance eventually (and read to a lesser extent).

Correct.  If it's not SSD, though, the loss of space recovery should be
the only risk.  And I imagine your highest tier of storage is not SSD.

Eric



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?53207816.7030104>