Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 21:32:26 +0000 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: d@delphij.net Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Http Accept filters (accf_http) Message-ID: <13383.1208899946@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:29:00 MST." <480E589C.8010108@delphij.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <480E589C.8010108@delphij.net>, Xin LI writes: >| Does anyone know why accf_accept is disabled by default in the ports' >| stock Apache 2.2 (it's disabled in the default config files)? I thought >| it was because it was dangerous or flawed for some reason, though (at >| least for light loads comparable to those of OP) it seems to work fine. I think adding them to the apache is OK, as long as apache fails gracefully if they are not present in the kernel. >Yes, I wonder that too. Personally I think it might be a good idea to >just bind accf_http and accf_data into GENERIC, as I always add them >into kernel configuration at my company... My $0.02 No, GENERIC should not be bloated when it can be effortlessly loaded as a KLD. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?13383.1208899946>