Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 06:59:42 -0400 From: "Andrew H. Derbyshire" <ahd@kew.com> To: "'Bruce Evans'" <bde@zeta.org.au>, "'M. Warner Losh'" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: RE: PCI SIO devices hog interrupts, cause lock order problems Message-ID: <00a701c49725$465caf80$84cba8c0@hh.kew.com> In-Reply-To: <20040910180421.Y1368@epsplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> > Does the distributed GENERIC > > : kernel have room for the PUC device? Are there side > effects that PUC should > > : be excluded from GENERIC? > > > > puc should be in GENERIC, imho. > > I agree. It is too large due to its sparse data structures, > but since the > sparse data compresses very well, it doesn't take any more space on > boot media than most drivers in GENERIC. I opened kern/71198 requesting this add last week. -ahd-
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?00a701c49725$465caf80$84cba8c0>