Date: Thu, 12 Dec 1996 19:50:53 -0500 From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@lcs.mit.edu> To: Bradley Dunn <bradley@dunn.org> Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Risk of having bpf0? (was URGENT: Packet sniffer found on my system) Message-ID: <9612130050.AA30153@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.WNT.3.95.961212171949.-3823323I-100000@swoosh.dunn.org> References: <9612121458.AA24275@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> <Pine.WNT.3.95.961212171949.-3823323I-100000@swoosh.dunn.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Thu, 12 Dec 1996 17:23:10 -0500 (), Bradley Dunn <bradley@dunn.org> said: > On Thu, 12 Dec 1996, Garrett Wollman wrote: >> Not if you run at security level 2, make all the files in /bin, /sbin, > You mean level 1, right? At level 2 it would be difficult to explain to > users why they can't upload their web pages. :-) No, I don't mean level 1, I mean level 2. That has nothing to do with users being able to upload their Web pages. To tag back with the original subject, BPF should probably refuse to work under high security level. -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same wollman@lcs.mit.edu | O Siem / The fires of freedom Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame MIT, LCS, ANA, or NSA| - Susan Aglukark and Chad Irschick
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9612130050.AA30153>