Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 19 Dec 2011 10:03:09 +0000
From:      Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org>
To:        Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>
Cc:        cvs-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/sysutils/xfce4-utils Makefile
Message-ID:  <CADLo838TKwEZwLfXsAYmXowKweM8MiC5=BT5NFGyegWyubcX=A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4EEF0AF1.20501@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <201112181751.pBIHpivv027591@repoman.freebsd.org> <4EEF0AF1.20501@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 19 Dec 2011 09:59, "Doug Barton" <dougb@freebsd.org> wrote:
>
> Thanks, that's 1/3 of the job done. :)  The problem is that the current
> OPTION creates the false idea that the only way you can lock your screen
> is to use xlockmore.
>
> Perhaps you missed my followup where I mentioned that the next step
> would be to add an OPTION for xscreensaver as well, and the logic to
> avoid having them both defined.

I'll look at that later.

> Better yet would be to detect if one or the other is already installed,
> and default the OPTIONS accordingly.

Autodetection in ports? No thanks!

Chris



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADLo838TKwEZwLfXsAYmXowKweM8MiC5=BT5NFGyegWyubcX=A>