Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 14:46:05 -0500 From: Michael Lucas <mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Gabriel Ambuehl <gabriel_ambuehl-fb@buz.ch>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Current for production? Message-ID: <20010327144605.A64359@blackhelicopters.org> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.010327102147.jhb@FreeBSD.org>; from jhb@FreeBSD.ORG on Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 10:21:47AM -0800 References: <74288556332.20010327201141@buz.ch> <XFMail.010327102147.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I'd like to reinforce this: I'm not a hacker, but have a -current box so I can write about it. (It's difficult to write a book targeting 5.1-release and time it for 5.1-R, when you don't have 5-current. This is one definite advantage Greg Lehey has over the rest of us authorial sorts.) With five years fairly hardcore FreeBSD experience, tracking -current is a *pain*. At any given point in time, 90% of the system works. The 10% that doesn't changes almost daily. If you want to invest your time in finding a particular date of -current that meets your needs, and you make a management decision that you will never, never, *never* upgrade without going through the same audit, go for it. Plus, I've made a management decision to never whine about what's broken, just live with it. (Okay, I do report broken buildworlds, but that's it.) My Pilot software locks the machine up; the web browser has been known to hang forever; the web server occasionally screams obscenities; other miscellanous ports just puke. Heck, I'm waiting for this laptop to phone the police and report me as a kiddie porn devotee, then anonymously transfer my bank balance to the Linux Foundation. It'll be for a technically sound reason, I know, but that still makes it a pain. I would run unionfs on a 3-stable production box before running -current in production right now. ==ml PS: You could also make a management decision to hire a kernel hacker to work on the part of -current that you need. :) On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 10:21:47AM -0800, John Baldwin wrote: > > On 27-Mar-01 Gabriel Ambuehl wrote: > > While I'm writing this: what is the general opinion about having > > CURRENT on production servers (I'd really love to deploy the ACLs > > ASAP)? I don't plan to use SMP and can wait for snapshots til the > > RELEASE comes... > > Don't. ACL's are still not production quality yet, and the SMP work breaks UP > kernels just as bad as SMP kernels when it breaks. > > -- > > John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> -- http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ > PGP Key: http://www.baldwin.cx/~john/pgpkey.asc > "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message -- Michael Lucas mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org http://www.blackhelicopters.org/~mwlucas/ Big Scary Daemons: http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/q/Big_Scary_Daemons To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010327144605.A64359>