Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 17:37:05 +0200 From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@freebsd.org> Cc: nectar@freebsd.org, standards@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [CFR] correct type of addrinfo.ai_addrlen and netent.n_net Message-ID: <86fyw32yqm.fsf@xps.des.no> In-Reply-To: <ygeu0kjigeg.wl%ume@mahoroba.org> References: <ygezmub1t1c.wl%ume@mahoroba.org> <20050531.075329.118637972.imp@bsdimp.com> <ygevf4zihhz.wl%ume@mahoroba.org> <20050531.084832.20036038.imp@bsdimp.com> <ygeu0kjigeg.wl%ume@mahoroba.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@freebsd.org> writes: > No, it is not blind bump. The following libraries refers > getaddrinfo(3), thus should be bumped: > > RELENG_5 HEAD Need to Bump > [...] > libpam 2 2 > pam_radius o > pam_unix o You can't just bump libpam; you need to bump all the modules along with it, because libpam will only load modules with the same major number as itself. In fact, there is only a single SHLIB_MAJOR for the entire src/lib/libpam tree, in src/lib/libpam/Makefile.inc. Is it really necessary to remove the padding? It gives us a lot of trouble for zero gain. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86fyw32yqm.fsf>