Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 29 Nov 2003 14:20:47 +0100
From:      des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=)
To:        slave-mike <slave-mike@rv1.dynip.com>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: NSS and PAM (was Re: NSS and PAM, dynamic vs. static)
Message-ID:  <xzp7k1jfh00.fsf@dwp.des.no>
In-Reply-To: <3FC89564.8030209@rv1.dynip.com> (slave-mike@rv1.dynip.com's message of "Sat, 29 Nov 2003 07:47:32 -0500")
References:  <20031129011334.GC88553@madman.celabo.org> <3FC89564.8030209@rv1.dynip.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
slave-mike <slave-mike@rv1.dynip.com> writes:
> why does /bin/sh need NSS support?

Because /bin/sh uses getpwnam().  We've been through this before.

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzp7k1jfh00.fsf>