Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 05:43:54 +0400 From: Andrey Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Tim Kientzle <kientzle@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: "David G. Lawrence" <dg@dglawrence.com> Subject: Re: tar -l versus gtar -l Message-ID: <20040802014353.GA67938@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <410D9957.5020308@freebsd.org> References: <40F963D8.6010201@freebsd.org> <200407291159.i6TBxKj01347@Mail.NOSPAM.DynDNS.dK> <4109BA1B.7090609@freebsd.org> <20040730080026.GA46093@nexus.dglawrence.com> <410A78B1.4030608@kientzle.com> <20040801221508.GF75481@nexus.dglawrence.com> <410D894D.7000209@freebsd.org> <20040802010910.GA63402@nexus.dglawrence.com> <410D9957.5020308@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 06:31:03PM -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote: > Would you be happier with this behavior? > > $ tar -cl /foo > Error: -l is ambiguous > If you want GNU tar -l, use --one-file-system instead. > If you want POSIX tar -l, use --link-warn instead. POSIX have higher importance. We should ignore any GNUisms in favour of POSIX overriding ones (at least to pass POSIX tests suite). -- Andrey Chernov | http://ache.pp.ru/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040802014353.GA67938>