Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 25 Jan 2002 13:43:33 -0800
From:      Kent Stewart <kstewart@owt.com>
To:        Neil McGann <neil@neilmcgann.co.uk>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: UDMA and 100Mbit NIC speed issues
Message-ID:  <3C51D185.2090600@owt.com>
References:  <5.1.0.14.0.20020125204321.00a0f4c0@pop.ntlworld.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


Neil McGann wrote:

> I'm seeing a problem with network upload speed using 4.4-Release when 
> the HD is in DMA mode. Basically the same as problem report kern/32338, 
> but the possible fix doesn't work for me.
> 
> Machine is a ASUS Cuple-vm mobo (VIA PLE133), 400MHz celeron, Netgear 
> FA311 NIC and IBM 60GX 60Gb deskstar on ULTRA100. Network is full-duplex 
> thro a 100Mbit switch.
> 
> Symptom is ftp upload is very slow in DMA HD mode 5 and much faster in 
> PIO mode. I see up/down of a (approx.) 100Mb file at 50s/29s in PIO and 
> 3m50s/33s in UDMA.


I have an ECS-K7S5A and an Amptron 830LM that have on board ATA-100 
and 100Mps networking. I am consistently seeing 11MB/s transfers 
between the systems. There are usually some shared IRQ such as the AGP 
and the 1st PCI slot. When I have an AGP video, I don't use the first 
slot.


> 
> I have tried disabling the on-board video, and then using a 3Com 3C905B 
> NIC, but the massive slowdown is the same. I tried a different FA311 in 
> a dual-boot Linux 2.4.x/Win 2K machine with a 40Gb version of the same 
> IBM drive (but a ULTRA66 controller on a 1GHz PIII) and Linux showed 
> _exactly_ the same slow-down symptom as FreeBSD. Win2K didn't slow down 
> - it was faster overall in TCP/IP (40sec/15sec) and MUCH faster in SMB 
> (15sec/15sec).



I don't have a 100MB file but I can transfer the packages for 
kde-2.2.2, which have a number of 9+MB files and see 11+MB/s on W2K. I 
don't see a difference in transfer rates on the SiS-735 chipset 
motherboards.

Kent


> 
> So - what is killing the performance in FreeBSD (and Linux) where Win2K 
> is much faster???? (is w2K doing adaptive disk throttling to maximise 
> network bandwith???)
> 
> Anyone got suggestions of how to start looking at this? I'm relatively 
> new to freeBSD and very pleased with it overall, but on the same 
> hardware W2K wipes the floor with it on sheer network/disk speed (at 
> least on UDMA/100Mbit).


> 
> Neil
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
> 
> .
> 


-- 
Kent Stewart
Richland, WA

mailto:kbstew99@hotmail.com
http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html
FreeBSD News http://daily.daemonnews.org/


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3C51D185.2090600>