Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 24 Jul 2015 18:16:34 -0500
From:      Mark Felder <feld@feld.me>
To:        Palle Girgensohn <girgen@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Brad Davis <brd@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-branches@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r392739 - branches/2015Q2/security/vuxml
Message-ID:  <1437779794.2853329.332590825.1F60B83A@webmail.messagingengine.com>
In-Reply-To: <9A468FE8-4FB1-4781-B21E-D16444233D80@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <201507231624.t6NGOPAZ039747@repo.freebsd.org> <20150724162312.GO94853@valentine.liquidneon.com> <1437756844.2148972.332341833.7702303E@webmail.messagingengine.com> <9A468FE8-4FB1-4781-B21E-D16444233D80@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Fri, Jul 24, 2015, at 16:38, Palle Girgensohn wrote:
> 
> > 24 jul 2015 kl. 18:54 skrev Mark Felder <feld@feld.me>:
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Fri, Jul 24, 2015, at 11:23, Brad Davis wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 04:24:25PM +0000, Palle Girgensohn wrote:
> >>> Author: girgen
> >>> Date: Thu Jul 23 16:24:25 2015
> >>> New Revision: 392739
> >>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/392739
> >>> 
> >>> Log:
> >>>  Shibboleth SP software crashes on well-formed but invalid XML.
> >>> 
> >>>  The Service Provider software contains a code path with an uncaught
> >>>  exception that can be triggered by an unauthenticated attacker by
> >>>  supplying well-formed but schema-invalid XML in the form of SAML
> >>>  metadata or SAML protocol messages. The result is a crash and so
> >>>  causes a denial of service.
> >>> 
> >>>  You must rebuild opensaml and shibboleth with xmltooling-1.5.5 or later.
> >>>  The easiest way to do so is to update the whole chain including
> >>>  shibboleth-2.5.5 an opensaml2.5.5.
> >>> 
> >>>  URL:    	http://shibboleth.net/community/advisories/secadv_20150721.txt
> >>>  Security:	CVE-2015-2684
> >>>  Approved by:	ports-secteam
> >>> 
> >>> Modified:
> >>>  branches/2015Q2/security/vuxml/vuln.xml
> >> 
> >> Shouldn't this have gone into HEAD? I thought vuln.xml was only used in
> >> head, not from the branches.
> >> 
> > 
> > And not even the current branch... That's weird.
> > 
> > Can we get old branches locked down a bit further?
> 
> Umm, sorry, my mistake, I had the 2015Q2 branch checked out, and just
> entierly missed it. I will merge to HEAD as I write... :-/
>

That's OK, things happen. I already copied your entry to HEAD.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1437779794.2853329.332590825.1F60B83A>