Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 11:27:37 +0200 From: Paolo Pisati <p.pisati@oltrelinux.com> To: Vini Engel <vini@fugspbr.org> Cc: FreeBSD_Ipfw <freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: [6.x patchset] Ipfw nat and libalias modules Message-ID: <20060703092737.GA2387@tin.it> In-Reply-To: <44A7E96C.3040200@fugspbr.org> References: <20060514220549.GA721@tin.it> <44A7E96C.3040200@fugspbr.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 01:42:36AM +1000, Vini Engel wrote: > Paolo Pisati said the following on 15/05/06 08:05: > > Released a new revision of my libalias+ipfw work as a > > patchset for 6.x, get it here: > > http://mercurio.srv.dsi.unimi.it/~pisati/libalias/libalias-6.x.tgz > > > > fixed the checksum corruption occurring to redirected/generated traffic > > to/by a local interface on the nat box. > > > > For more info: > > http://wikitest.freebsd.org/moin.cgi/PaoloPisati > > Hi guys, > > I was wondering how stable this is at the moment? I am very keen on > using it on my production box(es) but would like to hear someone else's > experience first. i know there're people using it on their productions boxes and i didn't hear anyone complaining, so i assume the code is stable. BTW i just started to cleanup my patch for HEAD, but it'll take a bit before i finish everything, so fell free to use the previous patch. bye -- Paolo Piso's first law: nothing works as expected!
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060703092737.GA2387>