Date: Sun, 22 Jun 1997 12:24:46 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: louie@TransSys.COM (Louis A. Mamakos) Cc: terry@lambert.org, adam@veda.is, joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: getty modem control Message-ID: <199706221924.MAA29222@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <199706220041.UAA25091@whizzo.TransSys.COM> from "Louis A. Mamakos" at Jun 21, 97 08:41:17 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Link-level compression is evil anyway; compression belongs on > > the host side of the host UART so that the datarate is not > > limited by the serial port rate. > > I disagree. Given that the modem is already doing V.42 link-level > reliablity, it fits in very nicely with it's segmentation. I can never exceed the DTE rate if the compression is done in the modem. If the compression is done in the host, I can routinely exceed the DTE rate. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199706221924.MAA29222>