Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 23 Mar 2016 12:59:17 -0400
From:      William Dudley <wfdudley@gmail.com>
To:        Daniel Feenberg <feenberg@nber.org>
Cc:        Valeri Galtsev <galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu>, krad <kraduk@gmail.com>,  Olivier Nicole <olivier.nicole@cs.ait.ac.th>, questions@freebsd.org,  Wayne Sierke <ws@au.dyndns.ws>
Subject:   Re: [Phishing]Re: Anti-virus for FreeBSD
Message-ID:  <CAFsnNZLF=Uoa5XbRcJk1aaSt8WJ9zzuYi1cKkS7Ycz7r7m1gGw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.20.1603231224140.8892@sas1.nber.org>
References:  <wu7vb4fm8ji.fsf@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <CALfReyeHNrqZsCd_-3gMb%2B5RDEnW8aK2QfYCDRSBG%2B3bN5tpsQ@mail.gmail.com> <1458712914.1578.37.camel@au.dyndns.ws> <62985.128.135.52.6.1458748953.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> <alpine.LRH.2.20.1603231224140.8892@sas1.nber.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
demime will remove attachments.  I don't know if it can be configured to
remove only certain kinds.

Bill Dudley


This email is free of malware because I run Linux.

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:31 PM, Daniel Feenberg <feenberg@nber.org> wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, 23 Mar 2016, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
>
>> Partly to toss some more fuel into the fire ;-) and partly to discourage
>> too harsh judgement of "some anti-vurus software not catching some
>> viruses" (or should I say virii as a plural of Latin word virus?)
>>
>> First of all, the whole anti-virus approach is fundamentally flawed. In
>> fact, you can not enumerate bad (what anti-virus is trying to do). You
>> only can enumerate good and prohibit everything else. So, don't be too
>> harsh on those [anti-viruses] that miss some of evil things sometimes:
>> remember, they are trying to do the task that is fundamentally flawed.
>>
>>
> Is there a package out there that would block all email messages with
> binary executable content? I understand that pdf and word files may contain
> executable code - the package would have to be able to distinguish such
> files with executable code and those without. (Is that possible)?
>
> For us, that would be a satisfactory substitute for Kaspersky, perhaps
> even a superior one.
>
> daniel feenberg
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFsnNZLF=Uoa5XbRcJk1aaSt8WJ9zzuYi1cKkS7Ycz7r7m1gGw>