Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 20 Jul 2004 14:32:11 +0000
From:      Murray Stokely <murray@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Marc Fonvieille <blackend@freebsd.org>
Cc:        doc@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Creating an Admin Handbook
Message-ID:  <20040720143211.GC17260@hub.freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20040720140759.GA69951@abigail.blackend.org>
References:  <20040719100354.GA90972@hub.freebsd.org> <20040720103432.GA64597@clan.nothing-going-on.org> <20040720104501.GB5405@hub.freebsd.org> <20040720124337.GA8096@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> <20040720140759.GA69951@abigail.blackend.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 04:07:59PM +0200, Marc Fonvieille wrote:
> For the moment
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/
> gives an "overview" of Handbook sections/chapters, if after the split(s)
> the Handbook keeps a similar ToC it will be fine, otherwise we will
> loose a part of the Handbook strengths.
> 
> Well this is "my personal opinion", and of course I see some advantages
> in the split, it's why I did not say "No" to the split.  I say "Ok but be
> careful" :)

It would be nice to have a shared table of contents for the online
version with :

Volume I : User Handbook
* Chapter 1 : Introduction
* Chapter 2 : Installation
...
* Appendix D

Volume II : Admin Handbook
* Chapter 1
...

We could create something like this with a Perl script during the web
build pretty easily.

Eventually we would want to do this with olinks and <books> in a
single <set> element.

	- Murray



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040720143211.GC17260>