Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2004 11:19:55 +0200 From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Brian Fundakowski Feldman <green@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/vm uma_core.c Message-ID: <xzpvfh2bykk.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20040704160339.GA997@green.homeunix.org> (Brian Fundakowski Feldman's message of "Sun, 4 Jul 2004 12:03:39 -0400") References: <200407041559.i64FxPpj048980@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040704160339.GA997@green.homeunix.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Brian Fundakowski Feldman <green@FreeBSD.org> writes: > Any subsequent desire to change the semantics of malloc(9) or > uma_zalloc(9) in the M_WAITOK case, such as this, absolutely must be > taken up with the Security Officer. There is no mention anywhere in the SO charter about the SO being responsible for your lack of maturity. If you have a technical argument to make, we have technical mailing lists for precisely that purpose. Otherwise, please allow Bosko to do what he thinks best. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpvfh2bykk.fsf>