Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 08 Jul 2010 09:32:26 +0200
From:      Martin Matuska <mm@FreeBSD.org>
To:        "Sam Fourman Jr." <sfourman@gmail.com>
Cc:        "Jason J. W. Williams" <jasonjwwilliams@gmail.com>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [CFT] ZFS v15 patch (version 3)
Message-ID:  <4C357F0A.70009@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinYeQtiCRSrLt6GAcrOcumugvPREizRrugXY5-0@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <4C31C71C.2010606@FreeBSD.org>	<AANLkTilPv4ujPjfexMQpEYZ7buk7oWwSS5B1l14Wjl0K@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinYeQtiCRSrLt6GAcrOcumugvPREizRrugXY5-0@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
User and group quotas is no important enhancement?

We have to see the whole thing from a stability perspective as well -
OpenSolaris has by far less testing than Solaris 10.
Oracle cannot afford to feed his enterprise customers (and these are not
few) with untested code.

Dňa 7. 7. 2010 20:30, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote / napísal(a):
> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Jason J. W. Williams
> <jasonjwwilliams@gmail.com> wrote:
>   
>> If the target is FreeBSD 9 instead of 8.1, why not merge ZFS v19? 15
>> really doesn't give any major enhancements over 14 and FreeBSD 9 isn't
>> coming out any time.
>>
>> 19 would give much need log device removal and triple parity RAID-Z.
>> Both of which are well tested at this point via OpenSolaris.
>>
>>     
> these are very valid points, but I am not sure that anyone has zfs v19 patches
>
>   



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C357F0A.70009>